Prediction of Tena Lukas [285th] vs Chloe Paquet [123rd] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W L W W W L L L L
Form
W W L W W L L W L WHead To Head: Lukas 1 - 0 Paquet
They have played 3 sets in total, with Lukas winning 2 and Paquet winning 1. The last match between Lukas and Paquet was at the Alphen aan den Rijn, 07-09-2015, First, Clay with Tena Lukas getting the victory 5-7 6-2 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tena Lukas | 1 |
| Chloe Paquet | 0 |
| Lukas | Stats | Paquet |
|---|---|---|
| 47% (8-9) | YTD Win/Loss | 35% (7-13) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| 285 | Ranking | 123 |
| 200 | Highest Rank | 96 |
| 29 | Age | 30 |
| - | Plays | R |
| 13 | Titles | 7 |
| 57% (451-335) | Career Total W/L | 51% (417-399) |
| $73,350 | Career Prize Money | $442,085 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 0 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-7 6-2 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 17 | Games Won | 11 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tena Lukas vs Chloe Paquet Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Lukas 1 - 0 Paquet
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lukas has won 38.77% of points on their second serve, while Paquet has won 41.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lukas, in recent form, has won 51.05% of their opponent's second serve points, while Paquet has won 50.08%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.03% and 31.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lukas has saved 48.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paquet has saved 49.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lukas has won 50.85% of matches played (W/L 30/ 29), with Paquet winning 44.78% (W/L 30/ 37) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lukas has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 409/ 258), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 24/ 48). Paquet has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 241/ 211), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 6/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Lukas has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.85% of matches (W/L 28/ 26), where as Paquet has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 51.28% of matches (W/L 20/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Lukas winning 1 times and Paquet being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Lukas winning 2 and Paquet winning 1. The last match between Lukas and Paquet was at the Alphen aan den Rijn, 07-09-2015, First, Clay with Tena Lukas getting the victory 5-7 6-2 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Lukas and Paquet have played a deciding set 1 times, with Lukas winning 1 times and Paquet 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Lukas winning 0, and Paquet 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lukas has played against opponents with an average rank of 242.86 while Paquet has played against players with an average rank of 251.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lukas has won 46% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paquet has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lukas has converted 45.09% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paquet has converted 32.05% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Tena Lukas vs Chloe Paquet Best Odds For The Match
Tena Lukas Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 6-0 6-7(4) 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats 
Kaitlin Quevedo
Player
Tena Lukas
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
0
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
15
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
Break Points Won
75%
(
6 of
8)
46%
(
35 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
48 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Susan Bandecchi
Player
Tena Lukas
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
57%
(
16 of
28)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
79%
(
11 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anastasiia Sobolieva
Player
Tena Lukas
63%
(
74 of
118)
1st Serve %
68%
(
86 of
126)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
51%
(
38 of
74)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
50 of
86)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
14 of
40)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
47%
(
56 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
62 of
126)
124
Total Points Won
120
|
7-6(6) 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Laura Pigossi
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
38 of
56)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Amina Anshba
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Kitti Molnar
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
71
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amarissa Kiara Toth
Player
Tena Lukas
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
74)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
7
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
42 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Ilay Yoruk
45%
(
40 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
2
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
40 of
69)
48%
(
23 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
12 of
37)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
54 of
106)
107
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 5-7 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tena Lukas
Player
Zongyu Li
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
67%
(
26 of
39)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
42%
(
15 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
43
Total Points Won
32
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Chloe Paquet Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 4-6 7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Barbora Palicova
Player
Chloe Paquet
70%
(
65 of
93)
1st Serve %
66%
(
77 of
117)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
57 of
77)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
44 of
117)
101
Total Points Won
109
|
7-5 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Andrea Lazaro Garcia
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
26 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tatjana Maria
Player
Chloe Paquet
53%
(
63 of
118)
1st Serve %
46%
(
67 of
147)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
16
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
47 of
67)
51%
(
28 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
35 of
80)
22%
(
5 of
23)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
40%
(
47 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
65 of
147)
136
Total Points Won
129
|
6-7(5) 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Clara Burel
Player
Chloe Paquet
60%
(
40 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Tamara Zidansek
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
81%
(
54 of
67)
0
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
22%
(
4 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
35 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Emiliana Arango
60%
(
66 of
110)
1st Serve %
75%
(
72 of
96)
2
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
73%
(
8 of
11)
Break Points Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
49%
(
54 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
51 of
96)
107
Total Points Won
99
|
3-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Simona Waltert
Player
Chloe Paquet
58%
(
41 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
44%
(
31 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
39 of
81)
79
Total Points Won
73
|
2-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Kaitlin Quevedo
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
66%
(
25 of
38)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
46%
(
18 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
46
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Chloe Paquet
Player
Marie Benoit
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
2
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
40%
(
27 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Lukas vs Paquet?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Lukas Vs Paquet is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57% (451/335) | Win/Loss | 51% (417/399) |
| 56% (1027/809) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (977/915) |
| 53% (8963/7969) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (8882/8507) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.23 |
| 1126 | Aces Total | 1919 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 2727 | Total Double Faults | 2737 |
| 1:6:55 | Average Match Time | 1:12:21 |
| 215.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 218.18 |
| 59% (21022/35900) | 1st Serve % | 59% (23759/40055) |
| 62% (13060/21022) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (15220/23759) |
| 43% (6340/14879) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (7212/16296) |
| 49% (2369/4794) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (2150/4742) |
| 48% (17383/36570) | Return Points Win % | 44% (17949/40522) |
| 58% (448/776) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 51% (413/805) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 46% (82/178) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (89/177) |
| 54% (144/268) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (117/259) |
| 84% (448/376) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 81% (437/355) |
| 16% (448/72) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 19% (437/81) |
| 22% (338/75) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (379/61) |
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Chloe Paquet
View full predicted draw for Paquet
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
